I am a big fan of comedy and particularly
when it relates to my real life. Hot
Fuzz is my favorite cop movie and of course, Master Ken of AmeridoTe is my
favorite comedian in the world of martial arts.
At this time, EnterTheDojoShow
has 485,000 subscribers, almost 70 million views, and 293 videos produced. The flip side of that, the sad side, is that
the reason there is so much comedic material available to him to work with, is
our industry is just filled with bad practices, ridiculous claims and outright
fraud.
The
big thing I want to discuss, and well it will be more venting as usual which is
basically what blogs are (therapy) because it is rare that anyone wants to
respond to them……… is the LAW. I could sit and just randomly scroll through
youtube and find a ton of martial arts training and demo videos that always
have a big finish. The veritable money
shot of martial arts. What I’m talking
about is stomping the groin, breaking the arm, breaking the leg, stomping the
head and all of these other big finishes you see in so many arts….particularly
hard style arts. My favorite is the
James Bond neck snap and all its variants.
Why? Because it looks cool. One of my great martial arts training buddies
has been training for decades in BJJ and his favorite saying when someone asks
why we do something a certain way is, “Cause chicks dig it.” In other words, because it looks cool and
makes us look cool……we think anyway.
Now I am not saying that these things may
not have a time and a place, but we now live in a civilized, law-suit happy
world. Taika Seiyu Oyata used to say that you fight two battles, the one
on the street and the one in the court.
I like to think of it as three fights as there are two court rooms you
can land in. The civil case as well as
the legal case.
So we like to think we are the good guys
and gals. That we are not going to be
the evil that starts a fight. That we
will be defending ourselves or others.
But what a lot of people don’t realize is that, depending where you live
in this world, that thin line separating the good from the bad, can move.
Initial
Physical Aggressor
Many years ago, most cops arriving on the
scene of some fight would ask, “Who started it.” If they could clearly tell that, this person
went to jail. In many jurisdictions both
parties went to jail as there are ordinances where it is illegal to fight…period,
end of story. Well this was the status
quo for many years in law enforcement as well as once the case was brought to
court.
Primary
Physical Aggressor
Well then, as always, things change. New terms came out like Primary Physical Aggressor. Here is just an example of one such definition
in a state statute.
The term "primary physical
aggressor" is defined as the most significant, rather than the first,
aggressor. The law enforcement officer shall consider any or all of the
following in determining the primary physical aggressor:
(1) the intent
of the law to protect victims of domestic violence from continuing abuse;
(2) the comparative extent of injuries inflicted or
serious threats creating fear of physical injury; and
(3) the history
of domestic violence between the persons involved.
|
Again, just in the United States alone,
each State will have slightly different laws, each municipality or county may
have little additions to it as well as the police themselves may have certain
policies based on all of the above. Apologies to my International buddies, I don't know your divisional boundaries. To my friends in New Zealand, Canada, England and Japan.....sorry.
Turning
to the Dark Side
Let’s just make up a hypothetical
example. There you are, listening to
your favorite band at the local bar. You
are just minding your own business and some drunk bumps into you but perceives
it the other way, that it is your fault.
You apologize and attempt to de-escalate. He eventually goes away but keeps
mean-mugging you (staring at you) from across the bar. Eventually you decide to head home and go out
to the parking lot. The drunk follows
you to the car. He throws a punch and
you, with all your years of training, are no match for the intoxicated guy and
simply parry it, throw an armbar on him.
He lands on the ground.
He
now is incapacitated by restraint.
He cannot throw another punch and since
you are well trained he has no avenue of defense. He cannot even kick. You now decide to ‘finish him’ by breaking
his arm so that he cannot attack you or anyone else further.
When the cops arrive, he was the INITIAL Physical Aggressor, but
witnesses explain that the drunk guy took a swing and that you pinned him,
whispered sweet nothings into his ear and after a few seconds, ‘snapped that
arm like a twig’. Guess what, you are
now quite possibly the PRIMARY Physical
Aggressor. You did more damage, when you
could have either let him up with a warning or waiting for the police to
arrive. It is quite possible that you
may be going to jail and even if that doesn’t happen, it is quite possible you
may lose a lawsuit in court having quite significant impact on you and your
family.
We
ALL Need to Train Our Students for This
When our students first learn techniques,
they don’t take armbars, tuite and other things to the ground. They are just learning the fundamental body
mechanics, studying the human weaknesses, et cetera. About 6th kyu we introduce
takedowns and pins. In with that, we add
Decision Trees, De-Escalation and Scenario Based Training.
So let us repeat the same basic scenario
with our students in the following manner;
We give the student a technique and they
go to the ground with their peer in class.
While they have their buddy pinned I ask them questions or just frame
the situational training with a description of their environment, possibly
similar to the above. I will use the
above scenario as Scenario 1.
Scenario
1:
Tavern Disturbance, Drunk Punch in the Parking Lot
-
Ask
the student to perform and armbar off of a punch
-
Once
pinned, ask the student what they do at this time.
o
Possible
Responses:
§
Explain
to the opponent while pinned, that you can easily break his arm if he continues
to resist. Say it loud enough that
witnesses hear and explain that you don’t want to hurt him but you equally don’t
want to get hurt.
§
Ask
someone to call the police, keep him pinned till the police arrive.
Related Story: Taika was at a tavern one
night with one of his students. It was a cold winter night in Missouri with
ice in the lot and sidewalks outside, and a nearly identical situation to the
one above occurred. A drunk decided to
pick a fight with one of Taika’s students.
Ego’s prevailed and they moved outside of the bar….onto the ice. His student slipped and fell to the ice,
the drunk jumped on top of him and got a couple of punches in before Taika
came up behind, grabbed the drunks arm and pinned him. Taika said that he told the drunk, “You
want arm break? It’s ok, easy do. No
problem for me. You want break or go
away?” This was from a hospital
conversation while I was sitting in Taika’s room about a year before he
passed away. There were a lot more
details in the story but suffice to say, Taika pinned the guy and de-escalated. They guy wholeheartedly agreed, even drunk,
that he didn’t want his arm broken and agreed to leave.
|
Scenario
2:
Public Park – Student is told they are out jogging in a public park but it is
early morning and they have not seen anyone else at all until someone jumps out
and attacks them, possibly trying to steal your wallet and phone.
-
Ask
the student to perform and armbar off of a punch.
-
Once
pinned, ask the student what they do at this time. Note: the nature of the armbar (in this
manner) doesn’t allow a way to access and dial your phone without letting the
suspect go.
o
Possible
Responses:
§
Explain
that you can break their arm if they continue to resist.
§
They
continue to resist.
§
Yell
for help – No answer
§
In
fear for your life, you may damage the opponent to prevent their continued
efforts to harm you. You are in fear for
your life.
Of course these are just a couple of
examples to get the students thinking. We
as instructors often claim to teach Self-Defense or Life Protection arts, but I
feel we often forget this very important thing.
In police training, when you go through the police academies worldwide,
you are constantly checked and evaluated based on scenarios. These test your physical skill, legal
knowledge, policy knowledge and checks how you hash it all out in a little more
realistic way. Teaching your students
how to survive an attack only to end up going bankrupt or serving time as a
result of stomping the head, is a vast disservice to them.
It is of great importance that now we live
in a society where people are more inclined to grab their cell phone and record
your fight than help you. This stage of
society has reached the point where everyone has a video camera in their pocket
that takes great videos. These will be
used for or against you in court. Of
note, the first part of the confrontation will most likely not be
recorded. So if the bad guy started the
fight, the first moments captured by the time they get the phone out and
started will be in mutual conflict.
Again, just my 2 ¥ but I think it
is high time we ensure our students understand the legal ramification of what
we do. That is why we teach in this
manner and do not teach to injure, maim, and break, et cetera unless it is
truly the only way to ensure the safety of ourselves or those we are
protecting.
Lee Richards